Free extension for sports fans
Advertisement
Advertisement

Why offside Kai Havertz should have been awarded a penalty for Arsenal

Published: Saturday, 7 November 2026 at 7:49 PM
Why offside Kai Havertz should have been awarded a penalty for Arsenal
Key Things to Know
  • Former referee Darren Cann argues Arsenal should have received a penalty despite Kai Havertz standing in an offside position.
  • Referee Farai Hallam ruled that Nobel Mendy committed a holding offence but awarded Hull City an offside free-kick.
  • Cann stated fouls committed before an attacker actively plays the ball should take precedence over offside positioning.
The Story in 60 Seconds

Arsenal's 1-0 victory over Hull City featured significant referee controversy after referee Farai Hallam declined to award a penalty to Kai Havertz. Hallam confirmed that Hull defender Nobel Mendy committed a holding offence in the 43rd minute, but gave Hull City a free-kick because Havertz was in an offside position. Martin Odegaard later scored the second-half winner to send Arsenal six points clear atop the Premier League.

Former Premier League referee Darren Cann suggested that Arsenal should have been awarded the penalty under the laws of the game. Cann explained that if an offside player is fouled while moving toward the ball before actively playing it, the foul takes precedence over the offside position. Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta expressed surprise at the decision and called for greater clarity on the rule's interpretation.

Advertisement

Never Miss a Sports Update

Get the latest sports news and top stories from MySportsTab delivered straight to your inbox.

No spam. Just the latest sports news and updates.