Free extension for sports fans
Advertisement
Advertisement

Why Arsenal should have had penalty vs Hull City

Arsenal should have been awarded a penalty against Hull City on Saturday, according to pundits and former officials.

Published: Sunday, 8 November 2026 at 10:06 AM
Why Arsenal should have had penalty vs Hull City
Key Things to Know
  • Pundits and former referees state Arsenal should have received a penalty against Hull City for a foul on Kai Havertz.
  • Arsenal won the match 1-0 thanks to a second-half goal scored by Martin Odegaard.
  • Referee Farai Hallam did not award the spot-kick because Havertz was positioned offside.
The Story in 60 Seconds

Pundits and former officials argue Arsenal should have been awarded a first-half penalty during their 1-0 win over Hull City. Referee Farai Hallam reviewed a foul on Kai Havertz via VAR monitor at the request of Michael Oliver, but decided against awarding a spot-kick because Havertz was standing in an offside position.

According to the rules cited by Dale Johnson and former official Darren Cann, the foul occurred prior to any active offside offense and should have taken precedence. Despite the missed decision, Arsenal ultimately secured the victory courtesy of a second-half goal from Martin Odegaard.

Advertisement

Never Miss a Sports Update

Get the latest sports news and top stories from MySportsTab delivered straight to your inbox.

No spam. Just the latest sports news and updates.