Dan Hooker explains how UFC ‘f*cked up’ the BMF title

Dan Hooker doesn't think the likes of Charles Oliveira should be involved in a BMF title fight.

By Farah Hannoun · Yahoo

Published: Wednesday, 4 November 2026 at 8:30 PM

Key Things to Know

Dan Hooker argues the UFC damaged the BMF title by involving Charles Oliveira against Max Holloway.
Hooker stated the BMF belt should feature exciting stand-up brawls rather than grappling-focused styles.
Hooker is preparing to face Brian Ortega following a recent knockout loss at UFC Paris.

The Story in 60 Seconds

UFC lightweight Dan Hooker argued that the promotion ruined the BMF title picture, specifically criticizing Charles Oliveira's involvement and approach against Max Holloway at UFC 326. Hooker contended that the BMF belt was originally intended for fan-friendly, stand-up striking battles rather than grappling-heavy strategies.

Hooker believes fighters like Oliveira do not fit the spirit of the ceremonial title. The remarks come as Hooker prepares for his upcoming matchup against Brian Ortega following a first-round knockout defeat at UFC Paris.

Read the full article on Yahoo

Dan Hooker explains how UFC ‘f*cked up’ the BMF title

More MMA News

Never Miss a Sports Update