Free extension for sports fans
Advertisement
Advertisement

The 10-Year Experiment That Failed: Why Kyle Larson’s Criticism of NASCAR Stage Points Hits Home

Kyle Larson was sitting in the best possible place to criticize NASCAR’s points system. He was leading the championship. Not barely, either. After four races of the new 10-race Chase, Larson had won at Gateway and Kansas, finished second at…

Published: Tuesday, 6 October 2026 at 6:35 AM
The 10-Year Experiment That Failed: Why Kyle Larson’s Criticism of NASCAR Stage Points Hits Home
Key Things to Know
  • Kyle Larson criticized NASCAR's stage points system for carrying too much weight in deciding the season championship.
  • Larson argued the format overvalues mid-race checkpoints compared to consistent full-race finishes, pointing to Ryan Preece's results.
  • Yardbarker notes stage points helped Christopher Bell salvage a 31-point day despite finishing 23rd with mechanical trouble.
The Story in 60 Seconds

Championship leader Kyle Larson criticized NASCAR's stage points system ahead of the race at Las Vegas Motor Speedway, questioning whether intermediate stage results carry too much weight in the title chase. Using Ryan Preece's consistent finishes as an example, Larson argued that the balance between stage-point accumulation and final race finishes may overly punish consistent drivers who miss out on mid-race checkpoints.

Yardbarker analyzes Larson's stance alongside the South Point 400 results, where Chase Briscoe won both stages and the race. The article notes counterarguments from drivers like Joey Logano and Carson Hocevar, who defend stage racing for rewarding front-runners despite late misfortunes, such as Christopher Bell's power-steering failure, while warning against rushing to overhaul the cumulative points format.

Advertisement

Never Miss a Sports Update

Get the latest sports news and top stories from MySportsTab delivered straight to your inbox.

No spam. Just the latest sports news and updates.