Free extension for sports fans
Advertisement
Advertisement

Positional Size: What’s old is new again, but can these Bucks deliver better results?

“Positional size” was the term Jon Horst used repeatedly in connection with Brayden Burries and Nate Ament during his post-draft press conference. And yes, while striving for as much positional size as possible is very much en vogue right now…

Published: Tuesday, 13 October 2026 at 12:10 PM
Positional Size: What’s old is new again, but can these Bucks deliver better results?
Key Things to Know
  • Jack Trehearne analyzes whether the Milwaukee Bucks can successfully adopt a positional size strategy unlike past failed attempts.
  • The writer notes general manager Jon Horst repeatedly emphasized positional size regarding recent additions Brayden Burries and Nate Ament.
  • Trehearne points out that Jason Kidd's oversized lineups struggled due to flawed defensive schemes and a lack of shooting.
The Story in 60 Seconds

Jack Trehearne examines the Milwaukee Bucks' apparent strategic shift toward prioritizing positional size, a trend echoed by general manager Jon Horst's recent draft comments. Trehearne compares this current direction to former head coach Jason Kidd's tenure, where relying solely on oversized rosters without functional skills or proper scheme design ultimately led to ineffective results.

Trehearne argues that modern positional size requires players to possess actual positional traits, shooting, and sound schemes rather than mere height. He highlights current players like Ousmane Dieng while noting that Milwaukee's coaching and player development staff must ensure functionality across the floor to make this philosophy successful.

Advertisement

Never Miss a Sports Update

Get the latest sports news and top stories from MySportsTab delivered straight to your inbox.

No spam. Just the latest sports news and updates.