Home » Sports » NFL » Cleveland Browns
The Cleveland Browns' surprising success has complicated the conversation around Deshaun Watson, but winning in 2026 doesn't have to change their long-term plans.

Dawg Pound Daily writer Dante Walker argues that the Cleveland Browns should not automatically retain quarterback Deshaun Watson even if he leads the team to a playoff run or Super Bowl victory. Despite Cleveland starting the 2026 season with a 5-2 record, Walker contends that Watson's play remains mediocre and the team's winning record is largely carried by defensive coordinator Mike Rutenberg's unit.
The piece highlights historic NFL precedent to show that postseason success does not require retaining a quarterback, citing examples such as Trent Dilfer with the 2000 Baltimore Ravens, Mitchell Trubisky, and Jared Goff. Walker points out that Watson ranks low in several quarterback metrics, arguing the Browns must avoid recommitting after his five-year, $230 million contract.
Jr. Browns Backers hosts Monster MatchupCleveland Browns
Shedeur Sanders’ latest move comes as Browns trade speculation intensifiesHITC
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.

Get the latest sports news and top stories from MySportsTab delivered straight to your inbox.
No spam. Just the latest sports news and updates.