Free extension for sports fans
Advertisement
Advertisement

Celtic board opposes five-year plan proposal — why does accountability feel stuck in the dark ages?

The Celtic board’s opposition to a published five-year plan leaves me asking a basic question: how can supporters judge the club’s direction when the leadership resists giving them clearer targets? The Celtic Trust wants a three-to-five-year football, financial and strategic…

Published: Friday, 6 November 2026 at 8:26 AM
Celtic board opposes five-year plan proposal — why does accountability feel stuck in the dark ages?
Key Things to Know
  • Vital Football's columnist questions the Celtic board's decision to oppose publishing a five-year strategic plan.
  • Celtic directors recommended voting against Resolution 16 at the upcoming December 1 AGM.
  • The Celtic Trust proposed measurable football and financial targets with remuneration linked to their delivery.
The Story in 60 Seconds

The Celtic board has recommended that shareholders vote against Resolution 16 at the upcoming AGM on December 1, opposing a proposal by The Celtic Trust to publish a three-to-five-year strategic plan. The Trust's proposal calls for measurable football and financial goals with executive remuneration linked to delivery, but Celtic directors argue that disclosing forward-looking strategic details would place the club at a competitive disadvantage.

Vital Football columnist Philip Cooney criticizes the board's stance, arguing that leadership is resisting accountability and clinging to an antiquated boardroom culture. Cooney points to clubs such as Brentford and Brighton as models for effectively communicating planning and recruitment strategies without sacrificing commercial confidentiality, urging Celtic executives to provide greater transparency and clear direction for supporters.

Advertisement

Never Miss a Sports Update

Get the latest sports news and top stories from MySportsTab delivered straight to your inbox.

No spam. Just the latest sports news and updates.