Free extension for sports fans
Advertisement
Advertisement

Tennis antitrust lawsuit explained: Why ATP, WTA and Grand Slam dismissal attempts failed

Why the lawsuit exists, what it accuses tennis' governing bodies of doing and what the next steps are.

Published: Friday, 2 October 2026 at 9:01 AM
Tennis antitrust lawsuit explained: Why ATP, WTA and Grand Slam dismissal attempts failed
Key Things to Know
  • A federal judge denied attempts by the ATP, WTA, and three Grand Slams to dismiss an antitrust lawsuit.
  • The lawsuit, brought by the PTPA and 15 players, alleges governing bodies suppress player compensation and market competition.
  • The defendants must now decide whether to pursue settlement talks or move ahead to the discovery process.
The Story in 60 Seconds

A federal judge in New York denied motions from the ATP Tour, WTA Tour, French Open, Wimbledon, and US Open to dismiss an antitrust lawsuit brought by the Professional Tennis Players Association and 15 players. Judge Garnett ruled the plaintiffs' allegations of anti-competitive practices were plausible enough to proceed past the preliminary dismissal stage. The governing bodies must now choose between negotiating potential settlements or entering the legal discovery phase ahead of an October 29, 2026 conference.

The class action lawsuit accuses tennis authorities of colluding to suppress player compensation, restrict free movement, and impose an punishing 11-month calendar. The legal fight continues despite the departure of PTPA co-founder Novak Djokovic in late 2025 and an undisclosed settlement previously reached between the players' association and Tennis Australia.

Advertisement

Never Miss a Sports Update

Get the latest sports news and top stories from MySportsTab delivered straight to your inbox.

No spam. Just the latest sports news and updates.